OK Win NotesOK Win Colour History Analyser: Random or Not
Paste the results you have and the tool sets them beside random lists: counts, streaks, runs and the “bet the opposite” rule, each with a plain verdict. It opens on 60 colours from our own generator, not taken from OK Win.
At the time of writing (8 October 2026), our notes on OK Win’s page include no list of round results. The “Winning information” feed shows masked names and amounts, which is not one. Readers bring lists and “trend” charts from elsewhere, so this tool starts from the list and not from the platform.
Where did the list come from?
- You typed it from a results screen on a page titled OK.Win. Note which end is the newest and tick the box if the newest comes first. We read no results screen, so count how many results yours shows.
- You copied it from a trend chart, a PDF or a channel. It is someone else’s display and may start or stop where a pattern looks good. Score the address in the link checker before you trust the list.
- A seller sent it to prove a rule. Paste it, read the rule row, then see the hack guide for what to do about the offer.
Sixty colours, check by check
The opening list holds 60 colours made by our generator, with the shares set at 40% green, 40% red and 20% violet. Those shares are an illustration: use the ones your screen states.
| Check | This list | Random lists | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of each colour | χ² = 1.8 on 2 degrees of freedom | usually below 6.0 | Consistent with random (p = 0.42) |
| Longest streak | 6 green in a row | usually 5; 6 or more in 25% of lists | Consistent with random (p = 0.25) |
A check calls a list “unusual” when its p-value falls under 0.05. That means random lists get flagged about 5 times in 100 on the counts alone: 5.4% in the tool’s 1,000 draws.
Does “bet the opposite” work?
The rule bets the other side after a set number of equal results in a row. It runs in digits and two-sides modes. Here are three lists from our generator, each tested against a coin’s 50%.
| List | Bets the rule made | Came off | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 big or small with a 9-long streak, rule after 3 | 24 | 8 (33%) | Consistent with random (p = 0.15) |
| 80 from a generator that likes to repeat, after 3 | 27 | 15 (56%) | Consistent with random (p = 0.70) |
| 60 built to swap almost every round, after 2 | 12 | 11 (92%) | Unusual for random (p = 0.006) |
Only the third list made the rule look good, and we built it to alternate. Random results do not. If a real list shows a rate like that, the tool cannot say why: a short list, a hand-picked stretch, a copying slip or results that are not random would all fit. In 9 of 10 random lists of 100 results, the rule comes off between 35% and 68% of the time.
One odd check proves little
Each extra check is another chance to look odd. These figures come from the tool’s fixed run of 1,000 random lists per row.
| Random list | Looks unusual on at least one check |
|---|---|
| 60 colours | 9% |
| 100 two-sided results | 14% |
| 100 digits | 17% |
| 300 digits | 19% |
Check ten random lists and one or two of them will look odd, with nothing behind it.
Paste a list in
- Choose what you are pasting: digits 0 to 9, colours G, R and V, or two sides such as B and S.
- Paste the results. Spaces, commas and new lines all work.
- Tick the newest-first box if it applies. Only the rule needs time order.
- Give at least 10 results. The counts check needs about 50 digits.
- Read the verdict column. Press the button below the result to draw random lists the same length as yours.
What it cannot tell you
We are not OK Win and cannot see inside it. The tool judges only the numbers you paste. None of it says anything about the next result, and the streak odds tool shows how often long runs appear by chance alone. The tools index lists the rest.
Want to see the platform’s own page next to your list? It opens in a new tab. Read the address bar before you type anything.
Opens the platform’s own page in a new tab. Referral link. 18+ only.
Common questions
My list has 24 digits and the counts check says too few. Why?
The check compares how often each digit came up with the expected 10%, and it only works when every digit is expected at least 5 times. For ten digits that means about 50 results. For colours with a 20% share it means about 25, and for two sides about 10. A shorter list still gets the streak and runs checks.
The newest result is at the top of my list. Does the order matter?
For the rule, yes. The counts, the streaks and the runs read the same forwards or backwards, but “bet the opposite after 3 in a row” must follow time. Tick the box that says your list starts with the newest result, and the tool turns it round before it tests the rule.
My list has 9 big in a row. Is that unusual?
Not by the tool’s 5% line. In a random list of 80 results the usual longest streak is 6, and 9 or more turns up in about 13% of random lists of that length. The tool calls that consistent with random (p = 0.13). A streak is a place to look, not a result.
Does “consistent with random” mean the results are random?
No. It means this check found nothing odd in the numbers you pasted. A short list cannot show much, and a list can pass every check and still come from something that is not random. The tool judges only the pasted numbers and says nothing about where they came from.
A chart shows the rule winning 8 times out of 10. How do I test it?
Paste the list in two-sides or digits mode and set the rule to the same number of results in a row. The tool needs at least 10 bets before it judges. Eight right out of ten has p = 0.11 against a coin’s 50%, so even that record is within what random lists give.
Can I paste period numbers beside the results?
Not safely. In digits mode the tool reads every digit as a result, so a long period number would be read digit by digit. It warns when groups of different lengths are mixed. Paste the results alone, and keep the period numbers out of the box.